SHREE GANESH NASTA CENTRE vs VAGHASIYA KALPESHBHAI LALJIBHAI Advocate - C P BUDDHADEV — 22/2025

Case under Trade Marks Act, 1999 Section 134,135. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 01st May 2026.

Issues Next hearing 01-May-2026 this date has passed

COMM TMCS - COMMERCIAL TRADEMARK CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJSR010109262025

Filing Number

22/2025

Filing Date

30-Aug-2025

Registration No

22/2025

Registration Date

30-Aug-2025

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

3-8th Addl District Judge

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Trade Marks Act, 1999 Section 134,135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHREE GANESH NASTA CENTRE

    Adv. H N JOSHI, J B CHHOTALA

  2. 2.HARISHBHAI TAILOR

  3. 3.SUNNYBHAI TAILOR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VAGHASIYA KALPESHBHAI LALJIBHAI Advocate - C P BUDDHADEV

Case History

  1. 01-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    Issues

    8th Addl District Judge

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Issues

    8th Addl District Judge

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Commercial Court (Surat) rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction in a trademark/passing-off case (TMSC No-22/2025). The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case against the defendant, noting that while both parties use similar marks ("SHREE GANESH LIVE ALOOPURI" vs. "GANESH LIVE ALOOPURI AND RASAVALA KHAMAN"), there is no monopoly over the common word "Ganesh," and the question of prior user must be determined at trial. The application was dismissed with costs to follow the main suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Issues

    8th Addl District Judge

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    Order On Injuction Application

    8th Addl District Judge

  7. 31-Jan-2026

    Order On Injuction Application

    8th Addl District Judge

  8. 17-Jan-2026

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    8th Addl District Judge

  9. 24-Dec-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    8th Addl District Judge

  10. 18-Dec-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    8th Addl District Judge

  11. 19-Nov-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    9th Addl District Judge

  12. 17-Oct-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    9th Addl District Judge

  13. 07-Oct-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    9th Addl District Judge

  14. 26-Sep-2025

    Service Of Process

    9th Addl District Judge

  15. 24-Sep-2025

    Service Of Process

    9th Addl District Judge

  16. 08-Sep-2025

    Service Of Process

    9th Addl District Judge

  17. 30-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 30-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 22/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Commercial Court (Surat) rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction in a trademark/passing-off case (TMSC No-22/2025). The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case against the defendant, noting that while both parties use similar marks ("SHREE GANESH LIVE ALOOPURI" vs. "GANESH LIVE ALOOPURI AND RASAVALA KHAMAN"), there is no monopoly over the common word "Ganesh," and the question of prior user must be determined at trial. The application was dismissed with costs to follow the main suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case