RAGHAVBHAI SHIVABHAI KEVADIYA vs BINA RAKESH NARANAG PROP OF IONU TRADING AS VEENA CREATION — 13/2024
Case under Trade Marks Act, 1999 Section 27,134,135,. Status: ISSUES. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.
COMM TMCS - COMMERCIAL TRADEMARK CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJSR010106542024
Next Hearing
29th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
13/2024
Filing Date
11-09-2024
Registration No
13/2024
Registration Date
11-09-2024
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT
Judge
3-8th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAGHAVBHAI SHIVABHAI KEVADIYA
Adv. J B CHHOTALA
Respondent(s)
BINA RAKESH NARANAG PROP OF IONU TRADING AS VEENA CREATION
MAHAVIR JAIN PROP OF MAHAVIR CREATION
RAJENDRA PRASAD BHAIYA PROP OF SUMAN PRINTS
KAUSHIKBHAI VINODBHAI BHINGRADIYA PROP OF DHINGU ENTERPRISE
Adv. -
USDADIYA JAYESHKUMAR VITTHALBHAI PROP OF MD SQUARES OVERSEAS
Adv. S A GHEVARIYA
FLIPKART INTERNET PVT LTD TRADING AS FLIPKART COM
Adv. K JHA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-8th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
ISSUES
ISSUES
ISSUES
ISSUES
ORDER ON INJUCTION APPLICATION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | ISSUES | |
| 07-03-2026 | ISSUES | |
| 16-02-2026 | ISSUES | |
| 12-01-2026 | ISSUES | |
| 20-12-2025 | ORDER ON INJUCTION APPLICATION |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The Commercial Court in Surat granted an interim (temporary) injunction restraining Defendants 4, 5, and 6 from using, marketing, or dealing with goods bearing the plaintiff's "Alanta" trademark or deceptively similar marks on e-commerce platforms until the next hearing. The court also directed Defendant 6 (the e-commerce platform) to suspend/takedown the infringing sellers' accounts and linked URLs upon notification by the plaintiff, noting that the defendants had not yet filed replies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The Commercial Court in Surat granted an interim (temporary) injunction restraining Defendants 4, 5, and 6 from using, marketing, or dealing with goods bearing the plaintiff's "Alanta" trademark or deceptively similar marks on e-commerce platforms until the next hearing. The court also directed Defendant 6 (the e-commerce platform) to suspend/takedown the infringing sellers' accounts and linked URLs upon notification by the plaintiff, noting that the defendants had not yet filed replies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts