HARSHITKUMAR SHANTIBHAI DHAMELIYA PROP OF MS HYZCLOTHING vs HIRAPARA RASILABEN JENTIBHAI PROP OF MS BARHMANI FAHSION — 8/2024
Case under Designs Act, 2000 Section 38,22,27,28. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
COMM TMCS - COMMERCIAL TRADEMARK CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJSR010076112024
Filing Number
8/2024
Filing Date
28-Jun-2024
Registration No
8/2024
Registration Date
28-Jun-2024
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT
Judge
3-8th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HARSHITKUMAR SHANTIBHAI DHAMELIYA PROP OF MS HYZCLOTHING
Adv. A G HADIYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.HIRAPARA RASILABEN JENTIBHAI PROP OF MS BARHMANI FAHSION
-
2.DAYABEN JIVANBHAI SUHAGIYA PROP OF MS SAREE ZONE TRADING AS GURUKRUPA FASHION
Adv. U H JOGANI
-
3.JOGANI HARDIK DAMJIBHAI PROP OF MS PANGHAT ENTERPRISE
-
4.CHIRAGKUMAR JAYANTIBHAI HIRPARA PROP OF MS CHIGS
-
5.MAYANI SAHIL ARVINDBHAI PROP OF MS SPARROW CREATION
-
6.JAYESHKUMAR JIVRAJBHAI DHANANI PROP OF MS MM VENTURES
-
7.BALDANIYA JAYDIP GOPALBHAI PROP OF MS KEYU FASHION
-
8.FASHNEAR TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD TRADING AS MEESHO COM
Adv. K JHA
-
9.FLIPKART INTERNET PVT LTD TRADING AS FLIPKART COM
Adv. K JHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The Surat Commercial Court disposed of Commercial TMSC No. 8/2024 through Lok Adalat by approving a compromise agreement (under CPC Order 23, Rule 3) between the plaintiff and defendants 1-7, while defendants 8-9 were deleted from the suit. The court made any interim relief absolute, ordered court fee refund to the plaintiff as permissible, and imposed no costs on either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
8th Addl District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
8th Addl District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
8th Addl District Judge
-
28-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
8th Addl District Judge
-
29-Jan-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
8th Addl District Judge
-
22-Dec-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
8th Addl District Judge
-
18-Nov-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
9th Addl District Judge
-
11-Nov-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
9th Addl District Judge
-
25-Sep-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
9th Addl District Judge
-
01-Sep-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
9th Addl District Judge
-
04-Aug-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
9th Addl District Judge
-
01-Jul-2025
OrderView PDF
-
01-Jul-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
9th Addl District Judge
-
12-Jun-2025
Written Statement
9th Addl District Judge
-
06-May-2025
Written Statement
13th Addl District Judge
-
21-Mar-2025
Written Statement
13th Addl District Judge
-
11-Feb-2025
Written Statement
13th Addl District Judge
-
18-Jan-2025
Written Statement
13th Addl District Judge
-
21-Dec-2024
Written Statement
13th Addl District Judge
-
22-Nov-2024
Written Statement
13th Addl District Judge
-
14-Oct-2024
Written Statement
13th Addl District Judge
-
20-Sep-2024
Written Statement
14th Addl District Judge
-
02-Sep-2024
Written Statement
14th Addl District Judge
-
12-Aug-2024
Written Statement
14th Addl District Judge
-
06-Aug-2024
Written Statement
14th Addl District Judge
-
02-Aug-2024
Written Statement
14th Addl District Judge
-
02-Jul-2024
OrderView PDF
-
02-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Jun-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 8/2024
The Surat Commercial Court disposed of Commercial TMSC No. 8/2024 through Lok Adalat by approving a compromise agreement (under CPC Order 23, Rule 3) between the plaintiff and defendants 1-7, while defendants 8-9 were deleted from the suit. The court made any interim relief absolute, ordered court fee refund to the plaintiff as permissible, and imposed no costs on either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts