VIVEK ALIAS LALO PUSHKARRAY RANCHHODDAS DAVE vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - R P DOBARIYA — 38/2025

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 451,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

GPID CRMA - GPID CRIMINAL MISC. APPL.

CNR: GJSR010071182025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

38/2025

Filing Date

13-06-2025

Registration No

38/2025

Registration Date

13-06-2025

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11

Police Station

CID CRIME POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 Section 451,
INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 406,409,420,120B,201,
PRIZE CHITS AND MONEY CIRCULATION SCHEMES (BANNING) ACT, 1978 Section 4,5,6,
GUJARAT PROTECTION OF INTEREST OF DEPOSITORS (IN FINANCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS) ACT, 2003 Section 3,

Petitioner(s)

VIVEK ALIAS LALO PUSHKARRAY RANCHHODDAS DAVE

Adv. C K THAKKAR

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat Advocate - R P DOBARIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

12-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

HEARING

09-03-2026

HEARING

17-01-2026

HEARING

20-12-2025

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The Sessions Court, Surat, allowed the petitioner's application under IPC Section 497 to unfreeze two bank accounts (PNB and HDFC) that were frozen in connection with criminal case FIR 11/2019. The court found that the petitioner had demonstrated hardship from the account freeze and that unfreezing was justified while the criminal investigation continues, subject to conditions requiring deposit of the frozen amount in court and periodic statements to the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Court, Surat, allowed the petitioner's application under IPC Section 497 to unfreeze two bank accounts (PNB and HDFC) that were frozen in connection with criminal case FIR 11/2019. The court found that the petitioner had demonstrated hardship from the account freeze and that unfreezing was justified while the criminal investigation continues, subject to conditions requiring deposit of the frozen amount in court and periodic statements to the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case