HARDIKKUMAR ASHOKBHAI SHAH DIRECTOR OF SHAH INVESTMENT vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - R P DOBARIYA — 53/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th April 2026.
GPID CRMA - GPID CRIMINAL MISC. APPL.
CNR: GJSR010037122026
Filing Number
53/2026
Filing Date
20-Mar-2026
Registration No
53/2026
Registration Date
20-Mar-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT
Judge
1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Decision Date
07-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
1155
Police Station
CHOWKBAZAR POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HARDIKKUMAR ASHOKBHAI SHAH DIRECTOR OF SHAH INVESTMENT
Adv. V S CHALIAWALA
Respondent(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - R P DOBARIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: 53/2026 Court Decision: The Surat Sessions Court ALLOWED the petition of Hardikkumar Ashokbhai Shah (Director of Shah's Investment) under IPC Section 497, ordering release of seized electronic equipment (Dell laptops, HP CPU, and currency counting machine) to the petitioner on conditions. The court found that the seized property belongs to the petitioner, with supporting bills, and that retention causes irreparable harm to legitimate business operations. The equipment must be maintained in original condition and produced before court when required, with proper CD documentation of serial numbers and photographs maintained by police. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
02-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
27-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 53/2026
Case Summary: 53/2026 Court Decision: The Surat Sessions Court ALLOWED the petition of Hardikkumar Ashokbhai Shah (Director of Shah's Investment) under IPC Section 497, ordering release of seized electronic equipment (Dell laptops, HP CPU, and currency counting machine) to the petitioner on conditions. The court found that the seized property belongs to the petitioner, with supporting bills, and that retention causes irreparable harm to legitimate business operations. The equipment must be maintained in original condition and produced before court when required, with proper CD documentation of serial numbers and photographs maintained by police. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts