CONDOR TRADE SRL vs CHETAN KUMAR GUPTA TRADING AS BSG PRODUCTS — 14/2025

Case under Trade Marks Act, 1999 Section 134,135,. Status: ISSUES. Next hearing: 01st May 2026.

COMM TMCS - COMMERCIAL TRADEMARK CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJSR010035142025

ISSUES

Next Hearing

01st May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

14/2025

Filing Date

24-03-2025

Registration No

14/2025

Registration Date

24-03-2025

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

3-8th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Acts & Sections

TRADE MARKS ACT, 1999 Section 134,135,

Petitioner(s)

CONDOR TRADE SRL

Adv. K R RAVAL

CONDOR FOOTWEAR INDIA LTD

Respondent(s)

CHETAN KUMAR GUPTA TRADING AS BSG PRODUCTS

Hearing History

Judge: 3-8th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

02-04-2026

ISSUES

07-03-2026

ISSUES

03-03-2026

ISSUES

10-02-2026

ISSUES

19-01-2026

ISSUES

Interim Orders

28-04-2025
ORDER
16-09-2025
ORDER

Summary: The Commercial Court, Surat granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiff in a trademark infringement case involving the registered trademark "INBLU." The court found that the plaintiff established a prima facie case, the balance of convenience favored the plaintiff, and irreparable loss would result without the injunction. The defendant is restrained from committing any infringement of the plaintiff's trademark until final disposal of the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Commercial Court, Surat granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiff in a trademark infringement case involving the registered trademark "INBLU." The court found that the plaintiff established a prima facie case, the balance of convenience favored the plaintiff, and irreparable loss would result without the injunction. The defendant is restrained from committing any infringement of the plaintiff's trademark until final disposal of the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case