SUNIL RAMESHBHAI SONI ALIAS VAYA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - R P DOBARIYA — 1902/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR010033692026

Filing Number

1903/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

1902/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

6-6th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

63

Police Station

MAHIDHARPURA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439
Indian Penal Code Section 406,420

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUNIL RAMESHBHAI SONI ALIAS VAYA

    Adv. T G CHAVDA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - R P DOBARIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: Cri. Misc. Application No. 1902/2026 The court rejected Sunil Rameshbhai Soni's bail application in a cheating case involving alleged purchase of diamonds worth Rs. 25,64,412 on credit without payment. The judge found prima facie evidence of guilt, noted the accused's prior criminal antecedents and history of evading law enforcement for nearly a decade, and concluded bail was inappropriate given the serious nature of charges and ongoing investigation risk. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    6th Addl District Judge

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Order

    6th Addl District Judge

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    6th Addl District Judge

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1902/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cri. Misc. Application No. 1902/2026 The court rejected Sunil Rameshbhai Soni's bail application in a cheating case involving alleged purchase of diamonds worth Rs. 25,64,412 on credit without payment. The judge found prima facie evidence of guilt, noted the accused's prior criminal antecedents and history of evading law enforcement for nearly a decade, and concluded bail was inappropriate given the serious nature of charges and ongoing investigation risk. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case