NAYAN JITENDRABHAI RATHOD vs Government of Gujarat — 1840/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 20th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSR010032722026
Filing Number
1841/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
1840/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT
Judge
6-6th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
20-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
515
Police Station
KAPODRA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NAYAN JITENDRABHAI RATHOD
Adv. M D
Respondent(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: Nayan Jitendrabhai Rathod v. Government of Gujarat (1840/2026) The court granted bail to 21-year-old Nayan Jitendrabhai Rathod, a diamond worker arrested on charges under BNS sections 74, 75(2), 352, 54 and POCSO Act section 12, related to allegedly applying color to a minor during Holi with sexual intent. The judge applied the principle that "bail is a rule and jail is an exception," considering the applicant had no criminal antecedents, a cross-complaint existed against the complainant, and prolonged custody would constitute pretrial conviction. Bail was granted with Rs. 25,000 personal bond and stringent conditions including monthly police station reporting, residence restrictions near the victim, and prohibition from leaving Gujarat. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Mar-2026
Disposed
6th Addl District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Order
6th Addl District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 1840/2026
Case Summary: Nayan Jitendrabhai Rathod v. Government of Gujarat (1840/2026) The court granted bail to 21-year-old Nayan Jitendrabhai Rathod, a diamond worker arrested on charges under BNS sections 74, 75(2), 352, 54 and POCSO Act section 12, related to allegedly applying color to a minor during Holi with sexual intent. The judge applied the principle that "bail is a rule and jail is an exception," considering the applicant had no criminal antecedents, a cross-complaint existed against the complainant, and prolonged custody would constitute pretrial conviction. Bail was granted with Rs. 25,000 personal bond and stringent conditions including monthly police station reporting, residence restrictions near the victim, and prohibition from leaving Gujarat. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts