SAGAR NANUBHAI SOJITRA vs Government of Gujarat — 1838/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 17th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSR010032702026
Filing Number
1839/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
1838/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT
Judge
8-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
3255
Police Station
VARACHHA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SAGAR NANUBHAI SOJITRA
Adv. R C DUDHREJIA
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat
Hearing History
Judge: 8-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDER |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Sagar Nanubhai Sojitra v. Government of Gujarat (Cri. Misc. App. No. 1838/2026) The court rejected the petitioner Sagar Nanubhai Sojitra's petition for bail under IPC Section 498 (regular bail). The petitioner was arrested on charges involving alleged fraudulent trade dealings and criminal breach of trust related to jewelry transactions worth approximately ₹15,48,000. The court found the allegations sufficiently serious and denied the bail petition, concluding that releasing the petitioner on bail was neither appropriate nor justified given the gravity of the charges and risk factors involved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Sagar Nanubhai Sojitra v. Government of Gujarat (Cri. Misc. App. No. 1838/2026) The court rejected the petitioner Sagar Nanubhai Sojitra's petition for bail under IPC Section 498 (regular bail). The petitioner was arrested on charges involving alleged fraudulent trade dealings and criminal breach of trust related to jewelry transactions worth approximately ₹15,48,000. The court found the allegations sufficiently serious and denied the bail petition, concluding that releasing the petitioner on bail was neither appropriate nor justified given the gravity of the charges and risk factors involved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts