DHIRAJ SANJAY MALI vs Government of Gujarat — 1836/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 17th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSR010032682026
Filing Number
1837/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
1836/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT
Judge
8-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
50
Police Station
HAZIRA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DHIRAJ SANJAY MALI
Adv. D S SHARMA
PRADIP PURANMASI GUPTA
SANTOSHKUMAR JAPAS MAHANTO
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat
Hearing History
Judge: 8-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Misc. Application No. 1836/2026 The court rejected the bail application of three accused persons (Dhiraj Sanjay Mali, Pradip Puranmasi Gupta, and Santoshkumar Japas Mahanto) charged with rioting, unlawful assembly, and violence during a workers' protest at AM/NS India premises in Hazira, Surat. The court found that given the serious nature of the allegations—involving stone pelting, vehicle damage, grenade explosion injuring police personnel, and disturbance affecting 5000+ workers—and the ongoing investigation stage, releasing the accused on bail posed risks of evidence tampering and witness interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal Misc. Application No. 1836/2026 The court rejected the bail application of three accused persons (Dhiraj Sanjay Mali, Pradip Puranmasi Gupta, and Santoshkumar Japas Mahanto) charged with rioting, unlawful assembly, and violence during a workers' protest at AM/NS India premises in Hazira, Surat. The court found that given the serious nature of the allegations—involving stone pelting, vehicle damage, grenade explosion injuring police personnel, and disturbance affecting 5000+ workers—and the ongoing investigation stage, releasing the accused on bail posed risks of evidence tampering and witness interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts