RAJANKUMAR SARVANSHAH GUPTA vs Government of Gujarat — 1832/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 17th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSR010032632026
Filing Number
1833/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
1832/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT
Judge
8-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
50
Police Station
HAZIRA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJANKUMAR SARVANSHAH GUPTA
Adv. D S SHARMA
BALVIRKUMAR RAMYASH RAJBHAR
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat
Hearing History
Judge: 8-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDER |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Misc. Application No. 1832/2026 The court rejected the bail application filed by Rajankumar Sarvanshah Gupta and Balvirkumar Ramyash Rajbhar, who were arrested for their alleged involvement in a violent incident at AM/NS India, Hazira, where workers formed an unlawful assembly, engaged in rioting and stone-pelting, damaged vehicles and CCTV cameras, and a hand grenade was used in an explosion injuring police personnel. The court found that given the serious nature of the allegations, ongoing investigation, and possibility of evidence tampering or witness interference, bail at this stage was inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal Misc. Application No. 1832/2026 The court rejected the bail application filed by Rajankumar Sarvanshah Gupta and Balvirkumar Ramyash Rajbhar, who were arrested for their alleged involvement in a violent incident at AM/NS India, Hazira, where workers formed an unlawful assembly, engaged in rioting and stone-pelting, damaged vehicles and CCTV cameras, and a hand grenade was used in an explosion injuring police personnel. The court found that given the serious nature of the allegations, ongoing investigation, and possibility of evidence tampering or witness interference, bail at this stage was inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts