NITINBHAI MANSUKHBHAI MANGAROLIYA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - R P DOBARIYA — 1831/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSR010032612026
Filing Number
1832/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
1831/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT
Judge
6-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
285
Police Station
PUNAGAM POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NITINBHAI MANSUKHBHAI MANGAROLIYA
Adv. P D BODA
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - R P DOBARIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 6-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDER |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Cri. Misc. Application No. 1831/2026 Court Decision: The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by Nitinbhai Mansukhbhai Mangaroliya. The court found prima facie involvement of the applicant in offenses under Sections 316(5), 318(4), and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, relating to alleged fraud and dishonored cheques worth Rs. 29,60,431 in a job-work transaction. The court determined that custodial interrogation remained necessary at the investigation's initial stage and that no exceptional circumstances justified granting anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Cri. Misc. Application No. 1831/2026 Court Decision: The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by Nitinbhai Mansukhbhai Mangaroliya. The court found prima facie involvement of the applicant in offenses under Sections 316(5), 318(4), and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, relating to alleged fraud and dishonored cheques worth Rs. 29,60,431 in a job-work transaction. The court determined that custodial interrogation remained necessary at the investigation's initial stage and that no exceptional circumstances justified granting anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts