SUNITABEN SWAMISARAN ALIAS MANOJ BADRIPRASAD TIWARI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - R P DOBARIYA — 1829/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 07th April 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSR010032592026
Filing Number
1830/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
1829/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT
Judge
6-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
185
Police Station
KOSAMBA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUNITABEN SWAMISARAN ALIAS MANOJ BADRIPRASAD TIWARI
Adv. B S PATEL
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - R P DOBARIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 6-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-04-2026 | ORDER |
| 30-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 23-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 17-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 1829/2026 Court Decision: The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat rejected the bail application of Sunitaben (47 years) who is accused of serious offenses under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses Act, 2012. Key Reasoning: The court found prima facie evidence of serious charges against the applicant and noted that the applicant's conduct was suspect—she previously claimed her daughter (the victim) was minor (DOB 09.10.2009) before the High Court and police, but later contradicted this by submitting school records claiming a different date of birth to argue the victim is now an adult. The court also determined that medical evidence (ossification test) showed the victim's age is between 16-18 years, and with the investigation at a crucial stage, releasing the applicant on bail could hinder fair investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 1829/2026 Court Decision: The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat rejected the bail application of Sunitaben (47 years) who is accused of serious offenses under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses Act, 2012. Key Reasoning: The court found prima facie evidence of serious charges against the applicant and noted that the applicant's conduct was suspect—she previously claimed her daughter (the victim) was minor (DOB 09.10.2009) before the High Court and police, but later contradicted this by submitting school records claiming a different date of birth to argue the victim is now an adult. The court also determined that medical evidence (ossification test) showed the victim's age is between 16-18 years, and with the investigation at a crucial stage, releasing the applicant on bail could hinder fair investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts