SUNITABEN SWAMISARAN ALIAS MANOJ BADRIPRASAD TIWARI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - R P DOBARIYA — 1829/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR010032592026

Filing Number

1830/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

1829/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

6-6th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

185

Police Station

KOSAMBA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 64(2)(F),(I)(M),75(2),88,89,94,54,115(2),238(B)
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Section 4,6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUNITABEN SWAMISARAN ALIAS MANOJ BADRIPRASAD TIWARI

    Adv. B S PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - R P DOBARIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: 1829/2026 Court Decision: The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat rejected the bail application of Sunitaben (47 years) who is accused of serious offenses under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses Act, 2012. Key Reasoning: The court found prima facie evidence of serious charges against the applicant and noted that the applicant's conduct was suspect—she previously claimed her daughter (the victim) was minor (DOB 09.10.2009) before the High Court and police, but later contradicted this by submitting school records claiming a different date of birth to argue the victim is now an adult. The court also determined that medical evidence (ossification test) showed the victim's age is between 16-18 years, and with the investigation at a crucial stage, releasing the applicant on bail could hinder fair investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    6th Addl District Judge

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Order

    6th Addl District Judge

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Order

    6th Addl District Judge

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    6th Addl District Judge

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    6th Addl District Judge

  8. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1829/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 1829/2026 Court Decision: The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat rejected the bail application of Sunitaben (47 years) who is accused of serious offenses under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses Act, 2012. Key Reasoning: The court found prima facie evidence of serious charges against the applicant and noted that the applicant's conduct was suspect—she previously claimed her daughter (the victim) was minor (DOB 09.10.2009) before the High Court and police, but later contradicted this by submitting school records claiming a different date of birth to argue the victim is now an adult. The court also determined that medical evidence (ossification test) showed the victim's age is between 16-18 years, and with the investigation at a crucial stage, releasing the applicant on bail could hinder fair investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case