TANVIR ABDULHAMID SHAIKH vs Government of Gujarat — 1828/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 17th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSR010032582026
Filing Number
1829/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
1828/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT
Judge
8-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
453
Police Station
AMROLI POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
TANVIR ABDULHAMID SHAIKH
Adv. C V SHAH
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat
Hearing History
Judge: 8-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDER |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 1828/2026 Petitioner: Tanvir Abdulhamid Shaikh Respondent: Government of Gujarat Court: Additional Sessions Court, Surat Date of Decision: 17 March 2026 Decision The court rejected the petitioner's bail application under Section 482 BNS, 2023. The petitioner was accused of assaulting a person named Krishna Kanyalal Sahani with a wooden stick during an altercation, causing injuries. Though the petitioner claimed he merely attempted to mediate between the parties, the court found strong evidence implicating him in the assault. Considering the serious nature of the charges, the necessity of custodial interrogation for investigation, and the risk that bail might compromise the prosecution's case, the court denied interim bail, holding that detention was warranted for proper investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 1828/2026 Petitioner: Tanvir Abdulhamid Shaikh Respondent: Government of Gujarat Court: Additional Sessions Court, Surat Date of Decision: 17 March 2026 Decision The court rejected the petitioner's bail application under Section 482 BNS, 2023. The petitioner was accused of assaulting a person named Krishna Kanyalal Sahani with a wooden stick during an altercation, causing injuries. Though the petitioner claimed he merely attempted to mediate between the parties, the court found strong evidence implicating him in the assault. Considering the serious nature of the charges, the necessity of custodial interrogation for investigation, and the risk that bail might compromise the prosecution's case, the court denied interim bail, holding that detention was warranted for proper investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts