NIKHIL HASMUKHBHAI SAVALIYA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - R P DOBARIYA — 1827/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 20th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR010032572026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1828/2026

Filing Date

11-03-2026

Registration No

1827/2026

Registration Date

11-03-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

6-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

20th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

86

Police Station

CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 319(2),318(4),336(2),338,336(3),340(2),61(2),3(5)
Information Technology Act, 2000 Section 66(D)

Petitioner(s)

NIKHIL HASMUKHBHAI SAVALIYA

Adv. R K JIVANI

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat Advocate - R P DOBARIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 6-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

20-03-2026

Disposed

18-03-2026

ORDER

13-03-2026

PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

20-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: Nikhil Hasmukhbhai Savaliya v. State of Gujarat (1827/2026) The court rejected Savaliya's anticipatory bail application in a cyber fraud case involving a fake Meesho e-commerce application. The applicant and co-accused allegedly conspired to develop and operate a fraudulent app, collected advance payments from customers for undelivered orders, and defrauded multiple buyers. The court found a prima facie case existed, determined custodial interrogation remained necessary for fair investigation since the accused was the app handler, and noted the applicant had been absconding, rendering the parity principle inapplicable despite co-accused receiving bail post-chargesheet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Nikhil Hasmukhbhai Savaliya v. State of Gujarat (1827/2026) The court rejected Savaliya's anticipatory bail application in a cyber fraud case involving a fake Meesho e-commerce application. The applicant and co-accused allegedly conspired to develop and operate a fraudulent app, collected advance payments from customers for undelivered orders, and defrauded multiple buyers. The court found a prima facie case existed, determined custodial interrogation remained necessary for fair investigation since the accused was the app handler, and noted the applicant had been absconding, rendering the parity principle inapplicable despite co-accused receiving bail post-chargesheet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case