SUNDAR BHIKHABHAI BHAROLIYA vs Government of Gujarat — 1825/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 20th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR010032552026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1826/2026

Filing Date

11-03-2026

Registration No

1825/2026

Registration Date

11-03-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

6-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

20th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

728

Police Station

KAPODRA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 137(2),64(2)(M),65(1),87
PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT, 2012 Section 3(A),4(1),4(2),5(L),6,8,12

Petitioner(s)

SUNDAR BHIKHABHAI BHAROLIYA

Adv. D P JARIWALA

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat

Hearing History

Judge: 6-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

20-03-2026

Disposed

17-03-2026

ORDER

13-03-2026

PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

20-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: Sundar Bhikhabhai Bharoliya v. Government of Gujarat (1825/2026) The court rejected bail for 23-year-old Sundar Bhikhabhai Bharoliya, accused of sexually abusing a minor girl under 16, kidnapping her under false promise of marriage, and committing offenses under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses Act. Finding prima facie evidence of serious charges and noting the investigation was at a crucial stage, the court held that bail could hinder fair investigation and risk victim intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Sundar Bhikhabhai Bharoliya v. Government of Gujarat (1825/2026) The court rejected bail for 23-year-old Sundar Bhikhabhai Bharoliya, accused of sexually abusing a minor girl under 16, kidnapping her under false promise of marriage, and committing offenses under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses Act. Finding prima facie evidence of serious charges and noting the investigation was at a crucial stage, the court held that bail could hinder fair investigation and risk victim intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case