GANESH SANTOSHKUMAR GAUNDA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - V L FALDU — 1818/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 09th April 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSR010032482026
Filing Number
1820/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
1818/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT
Judge
6-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
29
Police Station
ASHWINIKUMAR POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GANESH SANTOSHKUMAR GAUNDA
Adv. P B PATEL
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - V L FALDU
Hearing History
Judge: 6-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-04-2026 | ORDER |
| 23-03-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
| 17-03-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat rejected Ganesh Santoshkumar Gaunda's bail application (Section 483, BNSS) on April 9, 2026. The 22-year-old accused faces serious charges under BNS and POCSO Act for allegedly luring a minor victim under false marriage promises, sexually assaulting her repeatedly across multiple locations in Surat and Odisha, and kidnapping her. The court found prima facie evidence including CCTV footage and call records supporting the prosecution's case, and denied bail citing risks of witness intimidation and flight from justice, noting that charge sheet filing strengthens rather than changes the prosecution's position. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat rejected Ganesh Santoshkumar Gaunda's bail application (Section 483, BNSS) on April 9, 2026. The 22-year-old accused faces serious charges under BNS and POCSO Act for allegedly luring a minor victim under false marriage promises, sexually assaulting her repeatedly across multiple locations in Surat and Odisha, and kidnapping her. The court found prima facie evidence including CCTV footage and call records supporting the prosecution's case, and denied bail citing risks of witness intimidation and flight from justice, noting that charge sheet filing strengthens rather than changes the prosecution's position. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts