DURBESH OMPAL RAJPUT vs Government of Gujarat — 1813/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR010032422026

Filing Number

1814/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

1813/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

7-4th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

550

Police Station

VARACHHA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 144(2)
Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 Section 3,4,5,7

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DURBESH OMPAL RAJPUT

    Adv. K K RAVAT

  2. 2.BHARATKUMAR SARANSINH RAJPUT

  3. 3.MUNESHKUMAR JAMANADAS RAJPUT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary: The court granted regular bail to three accused (Durbesh Ompal Rajput, Bharatkumar Saransinh Rajput, and Muneshkumar Jamanadas Rajput) charged under IPC Section 144(2) and human trafficking provisions. The judge found that investigation was substantially complete, no evidence of tampering with witnesses, and continued custody unjustified for young offenders, applying Supreme Court principles from *Sanjay Chandra v. CBI*. Each accused was released on ₹25,000 bail with strict conditions including non-interference with complainants and regular cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl District Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1813/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court granted regular bail to three accused (Durbesh Ompal Rajput, Bharatkumar Saransinh Rajput, and Muneshkumar Jamanadas Rajput) charged under IPC Section 144(2) and human trafficking provisions. The judge found that investigation was substantially complete, no evidence of tampering with witnesses, and continued custody unjustified for young offenders, applying Supreme Court principles from *Sanjay Chandra v. CBI*. Each accused was released on ₹25,000 bail with strict conditions including non-interference with complainants and regular cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case