SIRAJ USMAN MASTAR vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - V L FALDU — 1811/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR010032402026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1812/2026

Filing Date

11-03-2026

Registration No

1811/2026

Registration Date

11-03-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

6-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

569

Police Station

KAMREJ POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) ANIMAL PRESERVATION ACT, 1954 Section 5,6,8
THE GUJARAT ANIMAL PRESERVATION (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2017 Section 6(A)(B),8(2)(4)

Petitioner(s)

SIRAJ USMAN MASTAR

Adv. R M ANSARI

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat Advocate - V L FALDU

Hearing History

Judge: 6-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

18-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

ORDER

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

The court rejected Siraj Usman Mastar's bail application in an animal preservation offense case. The judge found prima facie evidence that the accused was transporting prohibited animal products, had prior criminal antecedents for similar offenses, and posed flight risks; the investigation remained at a crucial stage requiring the accused's custody to prevent obstruction of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected Siraj Usman Mastar's bail application in an animal preservation offense case. The judge found prima facie evidence that the accused was transporting prohibited animal products, had prior criminal antecedents for similar offenses, and posed flight risks; the investigation remained at a crucial stage requiring the accused's custody to prevent obstruction of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case