JAYANTIBHAI HIRAJIBHAI GONDALIYA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - S K GOHIL — 1805/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSR010032292026
Filing Number
1806/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
1805/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT
Judge
3-8th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
311
Police Station
CHOWKBAZAR POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JAYANTIBHAI HIRAJIBHAI GONDALIYA
Adv. D M KAMANI
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - S K GOHIL
Hearing History
Judge: 3-8th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Cr.M.A.S. No. 1805 of 2026 Decision: The court granted bail to accused Jayantibhai Hirajibhai Gondaliya in a case involving charges under Sections 108, 115(2), 324(4), and 54 of BNS 2023 (related to alleged abetment of suicide). Key Reasoning: The court found no prima facie case for the abetment charge, noting the accused lacked mens rea and the FIR was lodged 21 days after the suicide. Following Supreme Court precedent, the court emphasized that abetment of suicide requires clear criminal intention and a direct act leaving the deceased with no option but suicide—elements absent here. The prosecution appeared frivolous; therefore, bail is the rule rather than the exception. Conditions: Release on Rs. 10,000 personal bond with one surety, passport deposit, residence affidavit, non-travel outside India without court permission, and regular court appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Cr.M.A.S. No. 1805 of 2026 Decision: The court granted bail to accused Jayantibhai Hirajibhai Gondaliya in a case involving charges under Sections 108, 115(2), 324(4), and 54 of BNS 2023 (related to alleged abetment of suicide). Key Reasoning: The court found no prima facie case for the abetment charge, noting the accused lacked mens rea and the FIR was lodged 21 days after the suicide. Following Supreme Court precedent, the court emphasized that abetment of suicide requires clear criminal intention and a direct act leaving the deceased with no option but suicide—elements absent here. The prosecution appeared frivolous; therefore, bail is the rule rather than the exception. Conditions: Release on Rs. 10,000 personal bond with one surety, passport deposit, residence affidavit, non-travel outside India without court permission, and regular court appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts