DEVANG HARISHKUMAR CHEVLI vs Government of Gujarat — 1758/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSR010031512026
Filing Number
1759/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
1758/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT
Judge
8-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
1217
Police Station
UMRA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DEVANG HARISHKUMAR CHEVLI
Adv. C N MEHTA
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat
Hearing History
Judge: 8-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | ORDER |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Devang Harishkumar Chevli v. Government of Gujarat (Cri. Misc. App. 1758/2026) The court granted regular bail to petitioner Devang Harishkumar Chevli under CrPC Section 439, rejecting the state's opposition. The petitioner, a bank manager, faced embezzlement charges involving misappropriation of funds from his employer's accounts. The court found insufficient grounds to deny bail despite serious allegations, considering the petitioner's local residence, family responsibilities, and cooperation with investigation. The court imposed standard bail conditions while noting the gravity of charges did not warrant continued custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Devang Harishkumar Chevli v. Government of Gujarat (Cri. Misc. App. 1758/2026) The court granted regular bail to petitioner Devang Harishkumar Chevli under CrPC Section 439, rejecting the state's opposition. The petitioner, a bank manager, faced embezzlement charges involving misappropriation of funds from his employer's accounts. The court found insufficient grounds to deny bail despite serious allegations, considering the petitioner's local residence, family responsibilities, and cooperation with investigation. The court imposed standard bail conditions while noting the gravity of charges did not warrant continued custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts