ASHISH NAVALKUMAR SUREKA vs Government of Gujarat — 1736/2026
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 25th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSR010031272026
Filing Number
1737/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
1736/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT
Judge
8-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11210015240049
Police Station
SURAT DCB POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ASHISH NAVALKUMAR SUREKA
Adv. V S CHALIAWALA
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat
Hearing History
Judge: 8-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 20-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 17-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Ashish Navalkumar Sureka v. Government of Gujarat (CrMA-1736-2026) The 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Surat dismissed Sureka's bail application under Section 483 BNNS for offences under IPC Sections 409 and 120B (criminal breach of trust and conspiracy). Sureka, accused of receiving goods worth ₹2.04 crores without payment (July 2023–March 2024), had previously obtained bail from the High Court with a condition to deposit ₹50 lakhs within six months. The court rejected his application, finding he violated the High Court's and Supreme Court's orders by failing to deposit the amount, absconding, and not surrendering even after the Supreme Court set aside his bail orders. Given the seriousness of the offence, his violations, and misuse of bail concession, the court found it inappropriate to exercise discretion in his favour. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Ashish Navalkumar Sureka v. Government of Gujarat (CrMA-1736-2026) The 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Surat dismissed Sureka's bail application under Section 483 BNNS for offences under IPC Sections 409 and 120B (criminal breach of trust and conspiracy). Sureka, accused of receiving goods worth ₹2.04 crores without payment (July 2023–March 2024), had previously obtained bail from the High Court with a condition to deposit ₹50 lakhs within six months. The court rejected his application, finding he violated the High Court's and Supreme Court's orders by failing to deposit the amount, absconding, and not surrendering even after the Supreme Court set aside his bail orders. Given the seriousness of the offence, his violations, and misuse of bail concession, the court found it inappropriate to exercise discretion in his favour. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts