KADIR SADDIK DHOBI vs Government of Gujarat — 1707/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 20th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR010030842026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1708/2026

Filing Date

07-03-2026

Registration No

1707/2026

Registration Date

07-03-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

6-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

20th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

584

Police Station

LALGATE POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 64(2)(I),(J),(M),99,54,123,143(1-D),143(1-F)
IMMORAL TRAFFIC (PREVENTION) ACT, 1956 Section 5(1-D),(2),9(1)
PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT, 2012 Section 4,6,8,17

Petitioner(s)

KADIR SADDIK DHOBI

Adv. M J SOLANKI

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat

Hearing History

Judge: 6-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

20-03-2026

Disposed

17-03-2026

ORDER

13-03-2026

REPLY OF I.O.

10-03-2026

REPLY OF I.O.

Final Orders / Judgements

20-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: 1707/2026 Court Decision: The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat, rejected Kadir Siddiqui Dhobi's bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found a prima facie case against the applicant for alleged involvement in human trafficking, sexual abuse, and exploitation of a minor victim, and determined that bail would risk witness intimidation and obstruction of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 1707/2026 Court Decision: The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat, rejected Kadir Siddiqui Dhobi's bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found a prima facie case against the applicant for alleged involvement in human trafficking, sexual abuse, and exploitation of a minor victim, and determined that bail would risk witness intimidation and obstruction of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case