FAIZAN PIR MOHMMAD SHAIKH vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - N L SUKHADWALA — 1684/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSR010030352026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1685/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
1684/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
279
Police Station
RANDER POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
FAIZAN PIR MOHMMAD SHAIKH
Adv. M M MASTAN
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - N L SUKHADWALA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Surat Sessions Court (dated 09.03.2026) granted bail to the accused Faizaan Peer Mohammad Sheikh in Criminal Petition No. 1684/2026 under Section 483 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure. The accused was charged with theft of approximately ₹4,21,000 in cash and gold jewelry from a complainant's residence under IPC Sections 305(a), 331(3)(4), and 54. The court found insufficient evidence of direct culpability and granted bail on ₹15,000 bond with strict conditions including maintaining police contact, non-interference with witnesses, and non-repetition of similar offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Surat Sessions Court (dated 09.03.2026) granted bail to the accused Faizaan Peer Mohammad Sheikh in Criminal Petition No. 1684/2026 under Section 483 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure. The accused was charged with theft of approximately ₹4,21,000 in cash and gold jewelry from a complainant's residence under IPC Sections 305(a), 331(3)(4), and 54. The court found insufficient evidence of direct culpability and granted bail on ₹15,000 bond with strict conditions including maintaining police contact, non-interference with witnesses, and non-repetition of similar offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts