MOHMMAD ZAID MUBARAK PATEL vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - N L SUKHADWALA — 1683/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR010030342026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1684/2026

Filing Date

06-03-2026

Registration No

1683/2026

Registration Date

06-03-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

279

Police Station

RANDER POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483,
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 305(A),331(3)(4),54,

Petitioner(s)

MOHMMAD ZAID MUBARAK PATEL

Adv. M M MASTAN

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat Advocate - N L SUKHADWALA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

09-03-2026

Disposed

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The Sessions Court of Surat granted bail to the accused Mohammad Zaid Mohammad Baarak Patel in Criminal Bail Application No. 1683/2026 under IPC Sections 305(A), 331(3)(4), and 54, as well as BNSS Section 483. The court found that while the accused was involved in a theft of ₹4,21,000 and jewelry from a residential property, the investigating officer's report and evidence did not conclusively establish the accused's direct involvement in the crime. The court granted bail on ₹15,000 security with various conditions including regular police reporting, non-interference with witnesses, and non-repetition of criminal conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Court of Surat granted bail to the accused Mohammad Zaid Mohammad Baarak Patel in Criminal Bail Application No. 1683/2026 under IPC Sections 305(A), 331(3)(4), and 54, as well as BNSS Section 483. The court found that while the accused was involved in a theft of ₹4,21,000 and jewelry from a residential property, the investigating officer's report and evidence did not conclusively establish the accused's direct involvement in the crime. The court granted bail on ₹15,000 security with various conditions including regular police reporting, non-interference with witnesses, and non-repetition of criminal conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case