MOHMMAD ZAID MUBARAK PATEL vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - N L SUKHADWALA — 1683/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR010030342026

Filing Number

1684/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

1683/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

279

Police Station

RANDER POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 305(A),331(3)(4),54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHMMAD ZAID MUBARAK PATEL

    Adv. M M MASTAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - N L SUKHADWALA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Summary The Sessions Court of Surat granted bail to the accused Mohammad Zaid Mohammad Baarak Patel in Criminal Bail Application No. 1683/2026 under IPC Sections 305(A), 331(3)(4), and 54, as well as BNSS Section 483. The court found that while the accused was involved in a theft of ₹4,21,000 and jewelry from a residential property, the investigating officer's report and evidence did not conclusively establish the accused's direct involvement in the crime. The court granted bail on ₹15,000 security with various conditions including regular police reporting, non-interference with witnesses, and non-repetition of criminal conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1683/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Court of Surat granted bail to the accused Mohammad Zaid Mohammad Baarak Patel in Criminal Bail Application No. 1683/2026 under IPC Sections 305(A), 331(3)(4), and 54, as well as BNSS Section 483. The court found that while the accused was involved in a theft of ₹4,21,000 and jewelry from a residential property, the investigating officer's report and evidence did not conclusively establish the accused's direct involvement in the crime. The court granted bail on ₹15,000 security with various conditions including regular police reporting, non-interference with witnesses, and non-repetition of criminal conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case