MOHMMAD ZAID MUBARAK PATEL vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - N L SUKHADWALA — 1683/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSR010030342026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1684/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
1683/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
279
Police Station
RANDER POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MOHMMAD ZAID MUBARAK PATEL
Adv. M M MASTAN
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - N L SUKHADWALA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Sessions Court of Surat granted bail to the accused Mohammad Zaid Mohammad Baarak Patel in Criminal Bail Application No. 1683/2026 under IPC Sections 305(A), 331(3)(4), and 54, as well as BNSS Section 483. The court found that while the accused was involved in a theft of ₹4,21,000 and jewelry from a residential property, the investigating officer's report and evidence did not conclusively establish the accused's direct involvement in the crime. The court granted bail on ₹15,000 security with various conditions including regular police reporting, non-interference with witnesses, and non-repetition of criminal conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Sessions Court of Surat granted bail to the accused Mohammad Zaid Mohammad Baarak Patel in Criminal Bail Application No. 1683/2026 under IPC Sections 305(A), 331(3)(4), and 54, as well as BNSS Section 483. The court found that while the accused was involved in a theft of ₹4,21,000 and jewelry from a residential property, the investigating officer's report and evidence did not conclusively establish the accused's direct involvement in the crime. The court granted bail on ₹15,000 security with various conditions including regular police reporting, non-interference with witnesses, and non-repetition of criminal conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts