MUKESHBHAI CHHAGANBHAI UKANI vs Government of Gujarat — 1673/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 16th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSR010030172026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1674/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
1673/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT
Judge
6-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
97
Police Station
SARTHANA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MUKESHBHAI CHHAGANBHAI UKANI
Adv. P D MANGUKIYA
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat
Hearing History
Judge: 6-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 12-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 09-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Surat Additional Sessions Court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Mukeshbhai Ukani, who was accused of cheating under Section 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, involving an alleged investment fraud of ₹65 lakh in a company with non-recovery of ₹58 lakh. The court found that existing statutory protections under Sections 41-41A of the BNSS and Supreme Court directions in *Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar* adequately safeguard against illegal arrest, making anticipatory bail unnecessary at that stage, and permitted the applicant to file a fresh application if police attempted arrest with concrete reasons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Surat Additional Sessions Court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Mukeshbhai Ukani, who was accused of cheating under Section 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, involving an alleged investment fraud of ₹65 lakh in a company with non-recovery of ₹58 lakh. The court found that existing statutory protections under Sections 41-41A of the BNSS and Supreme Court directions in *Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar* adequately safeguard against illegal arrest, making anticipatory bail unnecessary at that stage, and permitted the applicant to file a fresh application if police attempted arrest with concrete reasons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts