MUKESHBHAI CHHAGANBHAI UKANI vs Government of Gujarat — 1673/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR010030172026

Filing Number

1674/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

1673/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

6-6th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

97

Police Station

SARTHANA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 318(4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MUKESHBHAI CHHAGANBHAI UKANI

    Adv. P D MANGUKIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary The Surat Additional Sessions Court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Mukeshbhai Ukani, who was accused of cheating under Section 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, involving an alleged investment fraud of ₹65 lakh in a company with non-recovery of ₹58 lakh. The court found that existing statutory protections under Sections 41-41A of the BNSS and Supreme Court directions in *Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar* adequately safeguard against illegal arrest, making anticipatory bail unnecessary at that stage, and permitted the applicant to file a fresh application if police attempted arrest with concrete reasons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    6th Addl District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Order

    6th Addl District Judge

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1673/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Surat Additional Sessions Court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Mukeshbhai Ukani, who was accused of cheating under Section 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, involving an alleged investment fraud of ₹65 lakh in a company with non-recovery of ₹58 lakh. The court found that existing statutory protections under Sections 41-41A of the BNSS and Supreme Court directions in *Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar* adequately safeguard against illegal arrest, making anticipatory bail unnecessary at that stage, and permitted the applicant to file a fresh application if police attempted arrest with concrete reasons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case