MONTU ALIAS MONU BIBUTI ALIAS VIBHUTI BHUSHAN CHAUDHARI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - N L SUKHADWALA — 1668/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR010030032026

Filing Number

1669/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

1668/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

62

Police Station

BHESTAN POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 305(A),331(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MONTU ALIAS MONU BIBUTI ALIAS VIBHUTI BHUSHAN CHAUDHARI

    Adv. P H DHIMMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - N L SUKHADWALA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The Surat Sessions Court granted bail to the accused in a theft case (IPC Sections 305(A) and 331(3)) on March 9, 2026. The court found that while the accused was charged with stealing ₹70,000 from the complainant's house with co-accused, insufficient evidence was found to justify continued detention. The bail was granted on ₹15,000 bond with multiple conditions including regular police reporting, non-contact with the complainant, and cooperation with the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1668/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Surat Sessions Court granted bail to the accused in a theft case (IPC Sections 305(A) and 331(3)) on March 9, 2026. The court found that while the accused was charged with stealing ₹70,000 from the complainant's house with co-accused, insufficient evidence was found to justify continued detention. The bail was granted on ₹15,000 bond with multiple conditions including regular police reporting, non-contact with the complainant, and cooperation with the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case