MANGLESH CHAMPAKLAL GANDHI vs DIPAK BRIJMOHAN SINDHI Advocate - S S TIWARI — 2/2023
Case under The Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Section 13. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 02nd May 2026.
COMM APL - COMMERCIAL APPEAL
CNR: GJSR010029672023
Filing Number
2/2023
Filing Date
02-Mar-2023
Registration No
2/2023
Registration Date
02-Mar-2023
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT
Judge
1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Decision Date
02-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MANGLESH CHAMPAKLAL GANDHI
Adv. S J JARIWALA
Respondent(s)
-
1.DIPAK BRIJMOHAN SINDHI Advocate - S S TIWARI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-May-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Commercial Appeal No. 2/2023 The Permanent Lok Adalat disposed of the appeal as withdrawn after the parties reached a compromise settlement. The appellant (Manglesh Champaklal Gandhi) paid the agreed compromise amount to the respondent to satisfy the judgment and decree from Commercial Execution Petition No. 68/2021, resulting in withdrawal of the appeal with no order as to costs and refund of court fees as applicable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-May-2026
Disposed
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
04-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
19-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
22-Dec-2025
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
20-Dec-2025
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
10-Dec-2025
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
15-Nov-2025
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
03-Nov-2025
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
22-Sep-2025
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
16-Sep-2025
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
15-Sep-2025
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
03-Sep-2025
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
28-Jul-2025
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
21-Jun-2025
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
19-Apr-2025
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
15-Mar-2025
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
03-Feb-2025
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
06-Jan-2025
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
24-Dec-2024
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
21-Nov-2024
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
03-Oct-2024
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
28-Aug-2024
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
07-Aug-2024
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
04-Jul-2024
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
12-Jun-2024
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
15-Apr-2024
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2024
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
08-Feb-2024
Reply
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
22-Jan-2024
Reply
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
18-Dec-2023
Reply
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
29-Nov-2023
Reply
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
30-Oct-2023
Reply
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
11-Oct-2023
Reply
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
14-Sep-2023
Reply
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
28-Aug-2023
Reply
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
07-Aug-2023
Reply
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
24-Jul-2023
Reply
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
03-Jul-2023
Reply
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
15-Jun-2023
Service Of Process
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
06-May-2023
Service Of Process
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
12-Apr-2023
Service Of Process
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
16-Mar-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Mar-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 2/2023
Case Summary: Commercial Appeal No. 2/2023 The Permanent Lok Adalat disposed of the appeal as withdrawn after the parties reached a compromise settlement. The appellant (Manglesh Champaklal Gandhi) paid the agreed compromise amount to the respondent to satisfy the judgment and decree from Commercial Execution Petition No. 68/2021, resulting in withdrawal of the appeal with no order as to costs and refund of court fees as applicable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts