NANUBHAI RAGHAVBHAI SOJITRA vs Government of Gujarat — 1653/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR010029662026

Filing Number

1654/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

1653/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

8-2nd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

3255

Police Station

VARACHHA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 316(5),54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NANUBHAI RAGHAVBHAI SOJITRA

    Adv. R C DUDHREJIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Surat Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to accused Nanubhai Radhvbhai Sojitra in a case involving alleged theft of sarees worth ₹15,58,900 under IPC Sections 316(5) and 54. The court found that while the prosecution raised concerns about tampering with evidence and flight risk, the accused demonstrated cooperation during investigation, had a distinct role compared to co-accused, and could be investigated without custody. Bail was granted on strict conditions including appearance at police station, surrender of passport within 7 days, cooperation in investigation, and not leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl District Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1653/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Surat Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to accused Nanubhai Radhvbhai Sojitra in a case involving alleged theft of sarees worth ₹15,58,900 under IPC Sections 316(5) and 54. The court found that while the prosecution raised concerns about tampering with evidence and flight risk, the accused demonstrated cooperation during investigation, had a distinct role compared to co-accused, and could be investigated without custody. Bail was granted on strict conditions including appearance at police station, surrender of passport within 7 days, cooperation in investigation, and not leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case