NANUBHAI RAGHAVBHAI SOJITRA vs Government of Gujarat — 1653/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR010029662026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1654/2026

Filing Date

05-03-2026

Registration No

1653/2026

Registration Date

05-03-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

8-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

3255

Police Station

VARACHHA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 482,
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 316(5),54,

Petitioner(s)

NANUBHAI RAGHAVBHAI SOJITRA

Adv. R C DUDHREJIA

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat

Hearing History

Judge: 8-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

10-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

ORDER

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Court Decision Summary The Surat Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to accused Nanubhai Radhvbhai Sojitra in a case involving alleged theft of sarees worth ₹15,58,900 under IPC Sections 316(5) and 54. The court found that while the prosecution raised concerns about tampering with evidence and flight risk, the accused demonstrated cooperation during investigation, had a distinct role compared to co-accused, and could be investigated without custody. Bail was granted on strict conditions including appearance at police station, surrender of passport within 7 days, cooperation in investigation, and not leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Surat Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to accused Nanubhai Radhvbhai Sojitra in a case involving alleged theft of sarees worth ₹15,58,900 under IPC Sections 316(5) and 54. The court found that while the prosecution raised concerns about tampering with evidence and flight risk, the accused demonstrated cooperation during investigation, had a distinct role compared to co-accused, and could be investigated without custody. Bail was granted on strict conditions including appearance at police station, surrender of passport within 7 days, cooperation in investigation, and not leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case