PRAVIN NAYABRAV MAHASKE vs Government of Gujarat — 1642/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSR010029462026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1642/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
1642/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT
Judge
6-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
291
Police Station
KHATODARA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PRAVIN NAYABRAV MAHASKE
Adv. V A SHUKLA
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat
Hearing History
Judge: 6-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | ORDER |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat granted regular bail to 21-year-old Pravin Nayabrav Mahaske, accused of offenses under BNS Sections 78(2), 351(1), 352 and POCSO Act Section 12, involving a minor victim. The court found that substantial investigation was complete, no further custodial interrogation was needed, and prolonged detention would constitute pretrial conviction, invoking constitutional principles of personal liberty (Articles 14 & 21). The applicant was released on a personal bond of ₹25,000 with surety and nine conditions including residence restrictions, monthly police reporting, and avoidance of the complainant's areas. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat granted regular bail to 21-year-old Pravin Nayabrav Mahaske, accused of offenses under BNS Sections 78(2), 351(1), 352 and POCSO Act Section 12, involving a minor victim. The court found that substantial investigation was complete, no further custodial interrogation was needed, and prolonged detention would constitute pretrial conviction, invoking constitutional principles of personal liberty (Articles 14 & 21). The applicant was released on a personal bond of ₹25,000 with surety and nine conditions including residence restrictions, monthly police reporting, and avoidance of the complainant's areas. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts