SAGAR VIRAJIBHAI PATADIYA vs Government of Gujarat — 1624/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSR010029292026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1625/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
1624/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT
Judge
6-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
194
Police Station
PUNAGAM POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SAGAR VIRAJIBHAI PATADIYA
Adv. M K GOHIL
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat
Hearing History
Judge: 6-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | ORDER |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat rejected a bail application filed by 29-year-old Sagar Virjibhai Patadiya under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The applicant was accused of offenses under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses Act, 2012, allegedly involving a minor victim below 17 years of age. The court found prima facie allegations of serious offenses, including luring the minor with false marriage promises and repeated sexual relations, and concluded that releasing the accused on bail at the crucial investigation stage could hamper fair investigation and harm the victim's interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat rejected a bail application filed by 29-year-old Sagar Virjibhai Patadiya under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The applicant was accused of offenses under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses Act, 2012, allegedly involving a minor victim below 17 years of age. The court found prima facie allegations of serious offenses, including luring the minor with false marriage promises and repeated sexual relations, and concluded that releasing the accused on bail at the crucial investigation stage could hamper fair investigation and harm the victim's interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts