MOHMAD YASHA HANIF ALIAS ANU MINDI SHAIKH vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - N L SUKHADWALA — 1618/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR010029182026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1619/2026

Filing Date

03-03-2026

Registration No

1618/2026

Registration Date

03-03-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 Section 439,
THE GUJARAT CONTROL OF TERRORISM AND ORGANISED CRIME ACT, 2015 Section 3(1)(2),3(2)(4),

Petitioner(s)

MOHMAD YASHA HANIF ALIAS ANU MINDI SHAIKH

Adv. Z K BELAWALA

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat Advocate - N L SUKHADWALA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

12-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

ORDER

10-03-2026

HEARING

06-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The Surat Sessions Court rejected the bail application (CrPC Section 483) of Mohammad Yashaa Habinafen (alias Anas Mandi Sheikh), a member of the notorious "Anas Mandi Gang" involved in organized crime. The court found that the accused had violated conditions of a previous bail granted by the High Court by repeatedly entering Surat city despite restrictions, thereby demonstrating flight risk and danger to society. The serious nature of charges under the Gujarat Control of Organized Crime Act (GOCTA) and the accused's history of organized criminal activity made continued detention appropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Surat Sessions Court rejected the bail application (CrPC Section 483) of Mohammad Yashaa Habinafen (alias Anas Mandi Sheikh), a member of the notorious "Anas Mandi Gang" involved in organized crime. The court found that the accused had violated conditions of a previous bail granted by the High Court by repeatedly entering Surat city despite restrictions, thereby demonstrating flight risk and danger to society. The serious nature of charges under the Gujarat Control of Organized Crime Act (GOCTA) and the accused's history of organized criminal activity made continued detention appropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case