PRAVINBHAI JILUBHAI DHADHAL vs Government of Gujarat — 1613/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 09th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSR010029132026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1614/2026
Filing Date
03-03-2026
Registration No
1613/2026
Registration Date
03-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT
Judge
8-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PRAVINBHAI JILUBHAI DHADHAL
Adv. D P GALANI
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat
Hearing History
Judge: 8-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | ORDER |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Surat Sessions Court rejected the regular bail application (Criminal Application No. 1613/2026) of accused Pravinbhai Jilubhai Dhadhal, who is charged with cybercrime offenses including cheating and money laundering involving ₹1.64 crore in fraudulent bank transactions. The court found that releasing the accused on bail would pose a risk of witness intimidation, evidence tampering, and continuation of cybercrime activities, particularly given the international organized crime network involved and the accused's previous bail rejection. The court emphasized that the severity of the cyber fraud scheme and the accused's central role in misusing bank accounts warranted continued judicial custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Surat Sessions Court rejected the regular bail application (Criminal Application No. 1613/2026) of accused Pravinbhai Jilubhai Dhadhal, who is charged with cybercrime offenses including cheating and money laundering involving ₹1.64 crore in fraudulent bank transactions. The court found that releasing the accused on bail would pose a risk of witness intimidation, evidence tampering, and continuation of cybercrime activities, particularly given the international organized crime network involved and the accused's previous bail rejection. The court emphasized that the severity of the cyber fraud scheme and the accused's central role in misusing bank accounts warranted continued judicial custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts