PRAVINBHAI JILUBHAI DHADHAL vs Government of Gujarat — 1613/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 09th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR010029132026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1614/2026

Filing Date

03-03-2026

Registration No

1613/2026

Registration Date

03-03-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

8-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483,
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 319(2),318(4),336(2),225(3),340(2),61(2),3(5),338,
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2000 Section 66(D),

Petitioner(s)

PRAVINBHAI JILUBHAI DHADHAL

Adv. D P GALANI

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat

Hearing History

Judge: 8-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

09-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

ORDER

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Court Decision Summary The Surat Sessions Court rejected the regular bail application (Criminal Application No. 1613/2026) of accused Pravinbhai Jilubhai Dhadhal, who is charged with cybercrime offenses including cheating and money laundering involving ₹1.64 crore in fraudulent bank transactions. The court found that releasing the accused on bail would pose a risk of witness intimidation, evidence tampering, and continuation of cybercrime activities, particularly given the international organized crime network involved and the accused's previous bail rejection. The court emphasized that the severity of the cyber fraud scheme and the accused's central role in misusing bank accounts warranted continued judicial custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Surat Sessions Court rejected the regular bail application (Criminal Application No. 1613/2026) of accused Pravinbhai Jilubhai Dhadhal, who is charged with cybercrime offenses including cheating and money laundering involving ₹1.64 crore in fraudulent bank transactions. The court found that releasing the accused on bail would pose a risk of witness intimidation, evidence tampering, and continuation of cybercrime activities, particularly given the international organized crime network involved and the accused's previous bail rejection. The court emphasized that the severity of the cyber fraud scheme and the accused's central role in misusing bank accounts warranted continued judicial custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case