FENIL MUKESH PATEL vs Government of Gujarat — 1608/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR010029062026

Filing Number

1609/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

1608/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

8-2nd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(E),116(B),81,98(2),116(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.FENIL MUKESH PATEL

    Adv. M G KOLSAWALA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The Surat Sessions Court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Kenil Mukesh Patel under IPC Section 482 in Criminal Misc. App. No. 1608/2026. The court found that the applicant was involved in smuggling foreign liquor (brand-name bottles valued at ₹35,800) and that there was sufficient evidence connecting him to the crime. The court held that since police custody interrogation was necessary for proper investigation and the case involved violations of the Indian Penal Code and Prohibition Act, bail could not be granted at this stage; therefore, the application was rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl District Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Order

    2nd Addl District Judge

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1608/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Surat Sessions Court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Kenil Mukesh Patel under IPC Section 482 in Criminal Misc. App. No. 1608/2026. The court found that the applicant was involved in smuggling foreign liquor (brand-name bottles valued at ₹35,800) and that there was sufficient evidence connecting him to the crime. The court held that since police custody interrogation was necessary for proper investigation and the case involved violations of the Indian Penal Code and Prohibition Act, bail could not be granted at this stage; therefore, the application was rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case