CHIRAG ASHOKBHAI UDVIYA vs Government of Gujarat — 1604/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR010028992026

Filing Number

1605/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

1604/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

8-2nd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 308(2),308(5),352,351(3),54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHIRAG ASHOKBHAI UDVIYA

    Adv. R V MODI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Surat granted anticipatory bail to Chirag Ashokbhai Udviya in a criminal case involving charges of extortion under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found that the considerable delay of nearly 10 months between the alleged incident (June-December 2024) and the FIR filing (April 2025), combined with co-accused persons already being granted bail by competent courts, warranted release on bail subject to strict conditions including a Rs. 25,000 surety and personal bond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1604/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Surat granted anticipatory bail to Chirag Ashokbhai Udviya in a criminal case involving charges of extortion under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found that the considerable delay of nearly 10 months between the alleged incident (June-December 2024) and the FIR filing (April 2025), combined with co-accused persons already being granted bail by competent courts, warranted release on bail subject to strict conditions including a Rs. 25,000 surety and personal bond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case