RAVIKUMAR SURESHBHAI GOHIL vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - T A PANCHOLI — 1603/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR010028982026

Filing Number

1604/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

1603/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

6-6th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 137(2),64(2)(I)(M),87
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Section 4,6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAVIKUMAR SURESHBHAI GOHIL

    Adv. S S KATYARE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - T A PANCHOLI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Summary The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat rejected the bail application of Ravikumar Sureshbhai Gohil (28 years), who is accused of kidnapping and sexually abusing a minor girl under the pretext of marriage, violating provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses Act, 2012. The court found prima facie evidence of the accused's involvement in serious offenses and held that releasing him on bail at the crucial investigation stage would hinder fair investigation and pose a threat to the victim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    6th Addl District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1603/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat rejected the bail application of Ravikumar Sureshbhai Gohil (28 years), who is accused of kidnapping and sexually abusing a minor girl under the pretext of marriage, violating provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses Act, 2012. The court found prima facie evidence of the accused's involvement in serious offenses and held that releasing him on bail at the crucial investigation stage would hinder fair investigation and pose a threat to the victim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case