RAVIKUMAR SURESHBHAI GOHIL vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - T A PANCHOLI — 1603/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 11th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR010028982026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1604/2026

Filing Date

03-03-2026

Registration No

1603/2026

Registration Date

03-03-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

6-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483,
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 137(2),64(2)(I)(M),87,
PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT, 2012 Section 4,6,

Petitioner(s)

RAVIKUMAR SURESHBHAI GOHIL

Adv. S S KATYARE

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat Advocate - T A PANCHOLI

Hearing History

Judge: 6-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

11-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

ORDER

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat rejected the bail application of Ravikumar Sureshbhai Gohil (28 years), who is accused of kidnapping and sexually abusing a minor girl under the pretext of marriage, violating provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses Act, 2012. The court found prima facie evidence of the accused's involvement in serious offenses and held that releasing him on bail at the crucial investigation stage would hinder fair investigation and pose a threat to the victim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat rejected the bail application of Ravikumar Sureshbhai Gohil (28 years), who is accused of kidnapping and sexually abusing a minor girl under the pretext of marriage, violating provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses Act, 2012. The court found prima facie evidence of the accused's involvement in serious offenses and held that releasing him on bail at the crucial investigation stage would hinder fair investigation and pose a threat to the victim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case