SANJAYKUMAR DIPNARAYAN vs Government of Gujarat — 1592/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR010028782026

Filing Number

1593/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

1592/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

8-2nd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 109(1),189(2),190,191(2),126(2),132,324(4),351(3),61(2)(1),238
Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 Section 3,4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANJAYKUMAR DIPNARAYAN

    Adv. V R SHUKLA

  2. 2.AJAYKUMAR RAMDEV

  3. 3.JAVAHARLAL RAMGULAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Court Decision Summary The Surat Sessions Court rejected the regular bail application of three accused (Sanjay Kumar Dipnarayan, Ajay Kumar Ramdev, and Jawahar Lal Ramgulal) under CrPC Section 439. The court found that the accused were involved in serious offenses including criminal intimidation, dacoity, and criminal intimidation related to labor disputes at a company, and were arrested after videos showing their involvement emerged. The court determined that granting bail at this stage would be inappropriate given the grave nature of charges and risk of evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1592/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Surat Sessions Court rejected the regular bail application of three accused (Sanjay Kumar Dipnarayan, Ajay Kumar Ramdev, and Jawahar Lal Ramgulal) under CrPC Section 439. The court found that the accused were involved in serious offenses including criminal intimidation, dacoity, and criminal intimidation related to labor disputes at a company, and were arrested after videos showing their involvement emerged. The court determined that granting bail at this stage would be inappropriate given the grave nature of charges and risk of evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case