SANJAY HARIRAM YADAV vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - S K GOHIL — 1585/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR010028612026

Filing Number

1586/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

1585/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

3-8th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

31

Police Station

HAZIRA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 303(2),316(2),317(4),287,288,61(2),54,3(5),316(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANJAY HARIRAM YADAV

    Adv. S S KATYARE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - S K GOHIL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary of Case 1585/2026 The 8th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat rejected the bail application of Sanjay Hariram Yadav, a vehicle driver accused of conspiring to steal chemicals from tankers and disposing of them negligently under serious criminal charges. The court found that while Yadav's co-accused was released on bail by the High Court, Yadav's direct role as the chemical-carrying vehicle's driver distinguished him from the co-accused, making parity inapplicable, and concluded there was sufficient prima facie evidence to detain him pending investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    8th Addl District Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1585/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 1585/2026 The 8th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat rejected the bail application of Sanjay Hariram Yadav, a vehicle driver accused of conspiring to steal chemicals from tankers and disposing of them negligently under serious criminal charges. The court found that while Yadav's co-accused was released on bail by the High Court, Yadav's direct role as the chemical-carrying vehicle's driver distinguished him from the co-accused, making parity inapplicable, and concluded there was sufficient prima facie evidence to detain him pending investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case