ANUJ KUMAR SONI vs Government of Gujarat — 1580/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR010028532026

Filing Number

1581/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

1580/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

8-2nd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 316(5),54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANUJ KUMAR SONI

    Adv. N P LAKHANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Order

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary The 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Surat granted anticipatory bail to Anuj Kumar Soni in a case involving alleged cheating under BNS Sections 316(5) and 54, where the applicant allegedly received Rs. 18,82,000 for imported gold but failed to deliver it. The court found the offense to be civil in nature, noted the absence of criminal antecedents, completion of investigation, and absence of custodial interrogation need. Bail was granted on Rs. 25,000 bond with strict conditions including cooperation with investigation and regular court appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl District Judge

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Order

    2nd Addl District Judge

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1580/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Surat granted anticipatory bail to Anuj Kumar Soni in a case involving alleged cheating under BNS Sections 316(5) and 54, where the applicant allegedly received Rs. 18,82,000 for imported gold but failed to deliver it. The court found the offense to be civil in nature, noted the absence of criminal antecedents, completion of investigation, and absence of custodial interrogation need. Bail was granted on Rs. 25,000 bond with strict conditions including cooperation with investigation and regular court appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case