PRATIK SATISH MATAPRASAD SHUKLA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - S K GOHIL — 1575/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR010028432026

Filing Number

1576/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

1575/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

7-4th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

84

Police Station

CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 308(7),204,61(2),3(5)
Information Technology Act, 2000 Section 66(C),66(D)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRATIK SATISH MATAPRASAD SHUKLA

    Adv. B J HIRAPARA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - S K GOHIL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The court rejected the bail application (CRMA S/1575/2026) filed by the accused under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found that the accused faced serious cybercrime charges involving digital arrest and financial fraud of substantial amounts, with investigation still ongoing and credible evidence suggesting risk of tampering with evidence and witness intimidation. The court also noted the accused's misrepresentation of address and existence of other co-accused absconding, warranting continued custody at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl District Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Order

    4th Addl District Judge

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1575/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the bail application (CRMA S/1575/2026) filed by the accused under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found that the accused faced serious cybercrime charges involving digital arrest and financial fraud of substantial amounts, with investigation still ongoing and credible evidence suggesting risk of tampering with evidence and witness intimidation. The court also noted the accused's misrepresentation of address and existence of other co-accused absconding, warranting continued custody at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case