ATENDRAKUMAR ATMARAM TIWANI vs Government of Gujarat — 1570/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSR010028352026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1572/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
1570/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT
Judge
8-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ATENDRAKUMAR ATMARAM TIWANI
Adv. S V VIRMANI
RAUSHANKUMAR RAMKUMARLAL KHATRI
SHAMBUNATH SURSAT YADAV
NIRAJSING KRISHNASINGH
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat
Hearing History
Judge: 8-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 06-03-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS | |
| 05-03-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The 2nd Additional District & Sessions Judge, Surat rejected the bail application of four accused persons charged with offences related to violent rioting at AM/NS India's Hazira premises. The court found that given the serious nature of allegations—including unlawful assembly, stone pelting, damage to vehicles and CCTV cameras, and injuries to police personnel—and since investigation was ongoing with roles yet to be determined, releasing them on bail posed risks of evidence tampering and witness interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The 2nd Additional District & Sessions Judge, Surat rejected the bail application of four accused persons charged with offences related to violent rioting at AM/NS India's Hazira premises. The court found that given the serious nature of allegations—including unlawful assembly, stone pelting, damage to vehicles and CCTV cameras, and injuries to police personnel—and since investigation was ongoing with roles yet to be determined, releasing them on bail posed risks of evidence tampering and witness interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts