ARVIND MANJHI BUDHAI PASWAN vs Government of Gujarat — 1569/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSR010028322026
Filing Number
1570/2026
Filing Date
02-Mar-2026
Registration No
1569/2026
Registration Date
02-Mar-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT
Judge
8-2nd Addl District Judge
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 21-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ARVIND MANJHI BUDHAI PASWAN
Adv. S V VIRMANI
-
2.ASHOKKUMAR MANGU CHAUDHARY
-
3.SIKANDAR PERAKASH SAH
Respondent(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Judegement
Summary: The 2nd Additional District & Sessions Judge, Surat rejected the bail application of three accused workers charged with rioting, unlawful assembly, and violence during an incident at AM/NS India premises in Hazira. The court found that the serious nature of the allegations—including stone pelting, damage to vehicles/property, injuries to police, and the snatching of a hand grenade—combined with the ongoing investigation and possibility of evidence tampering, warranted denial of bail at that investigative stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Addl District Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Order
2nd Addl District Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Process To Respondents
2nd Addl District Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 1569/2026
Summary: The 2nd Additional District & Sessions Judge, Surat rejected the bail application of three accused workers charged with rioting, unlawful assembly, and violence during an incident at AM/NS India premises in Hazira. The court found that the serious nature of the allegations—including stone pelting, damage to vehicles/property, injuries to police, and the snatching of a hand grenade—combined with the ongoing investigation and possibility of evidence tampering, warranted denial of bail at that investigative stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts