RAJDIP ALIAS HIRA VIJAY SALUKE vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - N L SUKHADWALA — 1568/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR010028312026

Filing Number

1569/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

1568/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

345

Police Station

UDHANA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 118(2),115(2),352,54,189(2),189(4),190,191(3)
Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJDIP ALIAS HIRA VIJAY SALUKE

    Adv. T M GHOGHARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - N L SUKHADWALA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The Surat Court granted bail to the accused Rajdip Urf Hira Vijay Salunke in Criminal Bail Application No. 1568/2026 under IPC Section 483. The court considered that the accused had no prior serious criminal history, co-accused received bail, and the investigation was ongoing, thus approving bail of ₹15,000 with conditions including regular police station appearances, non-interference with witnesses, and maintaining residence within Gujarat jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1568/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Surat Court granted bail to the accused Rajdip Urf Hira Vijay Salunke in Criminal Bail Application No. 1568/2026 under IPC Section 483. The court considered that the accused had no prior serious criminal history, co-accused received bail, and the investigation was ongoing, thus approving bail of ₹15,000 with conditions including regular police station appearances, non-interference with witnesses, and maintaining residence within Gujarat jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case