YATIN RAMESHCHANDRA DESAI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - R P DOBARIYA — 45/2026
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.
GPID CRMA - GPID CRIMINAL MISC. APPL.
CNR: GJSR010028092026
Filing Number
45/2026
Filing Date
02-Mar-2026
Registration No
45/2026
Registration Date
02-Mar-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT
Judge
1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11210066220107
Police Station
PAL POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.YATIN RAMESHCHANDRA DESAI
Adv. K J PAREKH
Respondent(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - R P DOBARIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The Surat Sessions Court granted bail to accused Yatindra Ramesh Chand Dasai under Section 438 of the CrPC in a financial fraud case involving ₹2.72+ crores defrauded from investors through a fake company scheme. The court applied the principle of parity, noting that co-accused Lataben had already been granted bail by the Gujarat High Court, and found no extraordinary circumstances justifying differential treatment, subject to strict conditions including a ₹1 lakh bond and court appearance requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Order
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 45/2026
Summary The Surat Sessions Court granted bail to accused Yatindra Ramesh Chand Dasai under Section 438 of the CrPC in a financial fraud case involving ₹2.72+ crores defrauded from investors through a fake company scheme. The court applied the principle of parity, noting that co-accused Lataben had already been granted bail by the Gujarat High Court, and found no extraordinary circumstances justifying differential treatment, subject to strict conditions including a ₹1 lakh bond and court appearance requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts