SURESH KUMAR MOHANLAL SONI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - T A PANCHOLI — 1550/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 10th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR010028072026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1551/2026

Filing Date

02-03-2026

Registration No

1550/2026

Registration Date

02-03-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

7-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

1266

Police Station

KATARGAM POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483,
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 316(5),61(2)(A),

Petitioner(s)

SURESH KUMAR MOHANLAL SONI

Adv. Y S KAPADIA

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat Advocate - T A PANCHOLI

Hearing History

Judge: 7-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

10-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

ORDER

05-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The 4th Additional Sessions Court in Surat rejected the regular bail application (CRMA S/1550/2026) of Sureshkumar Mohanlal Soni, who was arrested under IPC Section 316(p) for allegedly defrauding jewelers. The court found credible evidence of the accused's involvement in a commercial fraud scheme involving theft of approximately ₹70 lakhs in gold jewelry, and noted his previous unsuccessful bail petition and potential to interfere with investigation. The court dismissed the bail plea and ordered that the criminal case proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The 4th Additional Sessions Court in Surat rejected the regular bail application (CRMA S/1550/2026) of Sureshkumar Mohanlal Soni, who was arrested under IPC Section 316(p) for allegedly defrauding jewelers. The court found credible evidence of the accused's involvement in a commercial fraud scheme involving theft of approximately ₹70 lakhs in gold jewelry, and noted his previous unsuccessful bail petition and potential to interfere with investigation. The court dismissed the bail plea and ordered that the criminal case proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case