CHIRAGBHAI KANJIBHAI DESAI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - N L SUKHADWALA — 1545/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR010027912026

Filing Number

1546/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

1545/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439(1)B
Indian Penal Code Section 124(A),115,201,153(A),505(2),506

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHIRAGBHAI KANJIBHAI DESAI

    Adv. S I DHORAJIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - N L SUKHADWALA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The Sessions Court, Surat granted the criminal revision petition filed by Chiragbhai Kanajibhai Desai, ordering the return of ₹1,00,000 deposited as security in connection with FIR No. 135/2015 registered at Amoroli Police Station. The court found that the underlying criminal proceedings had concluded and there was no justification for retaining the deposited amount in its custody, hence directing its release to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Order

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1545/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Court, Surat granted the criminal revision petition filed by Chiragbhai Kanajibhai Desai, ordering the return of ₹1,00,000 deposited as security in connection with FIR No. 135/2015 registered at Amoroli Police Station. The court found that the underlying criminal proceedings had concluded and there was no justification for retaining the deposited amount in its custody, hence directing its release to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case