PIYUSH JAGDISHBHAI NAYAKA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - T A PANCHOLI — 1543/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483(1),. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 10th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSR010027892026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1544/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
1543/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT
Judge
7-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11210054242533
Police Station
SACHIN POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PIYUSH JAGDISHBHAI NAYAKA
Adv. S B PAWAR
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - T A PANCHOLI
Hearing History
Judge: 7-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 05-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Surat 4th Additional Sessions Court rejected the bail application (CRMA S/1543/2026) of accused Piyush Gadishbhai Nayaka, who is charged with serious crimes under BNS sections 103(1), 118(2), 336, 384, and GP Act section 135(1) for allegedly causing fatal injuries to a person. The court found the charges grave, noted the accused's criminal history with multiple prior cases, and considered the risk of witness tampering given that the accused and complainant live in the same area, making temporary bail unsuitable under the circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Surat 4th Additional Sessions Court rejected the bail application (CRMA S/1543/2026) of accused Piyush Gadishbhai Nayaka, who is charged with serious crimes under BNS sections 103(1), 118(2), 336, 384, and GP Act section 135(1) for allegedly causing fatal injuries to a person. The court found the charges grave, noted the accused's criminal history with multiple prior cases, and considered the risk of witness tampering given that the accused and complainant live in the same area, making temporary bail unsuitable under the circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts