AJITKUMAR SATYADEV RAY vs Government of Gujarat — 1539/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 09th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSR010027822026
Filing Number
1540/2026
Filing Date
02-Mar-2026
Registration No
1539/2026
Registration Date
02-Mar-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT
Judge
6-6th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
5248
Police Station
PANDESARA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AJITKUMAR SATYADEV RAY
Adv. C V SHAH
Respondent(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat, rejected the bail application of 18-year-old Ajitkumar Satyadev Rai, who is accused of sexually abusing a minor girl below 14 years of age under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses Act, 2012. The court found prima facie evidence of serious charges including luring the victim under false marriage promises and taking her to Uttar Pradesh for repeated sexual assault, and held that bail at the investigation's crucial stage could obstruct fair investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
6th Addl District Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 1539/2026
Summary The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat, rejected the bail application of 18-year-old Ajitkumar Satyadev Rai, who is accused of sexually abusing a minor girl below 14 years of age under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses Act, 2012. The court found prima facie evidence of serious charges including luring the victim under false marriage promises and taking her to Uttar Pradesh for repeated sexual assault, and held that bail at the investigation's crucial stage could obstruct fair investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts