ALPESH NATHABHAI GEDIYA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - V L FALDU — 1534/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 20th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR010027722026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1535/2026

Filing Date

28-02-2026

Registration No

1534/2026

Registration Date

28-02-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

6-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

20th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

451

Police Station

AMROLI POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 482,
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 64(2)(F)(M),115(2),351(2),

Petitioner(s)

ALPESH NATHABHAI GEDIYA

Adv. Y B VALA

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat Advocate - V L FALDU

Hearing History

Judge: 6-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

20-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

ORDER

09-03-2026

HEARING

03-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

20-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Judgment Summary The 6th Additional District & Sessions Judge, Surat rejected the anticipatory bail application of Alpesh Nathabhai Gediya, who was accused of sexual assault and coercion under BNS sections 64(2)(F)(M), 115(2), and 351(2). The court found a prima facie case against the applicant based on allegations that he forcibly engaged in sexual relations with the victim by threatening to share intimate photos, and subsequently threatened her. The court held that the investigation was at a crucial initial stage and custodial interrogation could not be ruled out, therefore no exceptional circumstances justified granting anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Judgment Summary The 6th Additional District & Sessions Judge, Surat rejected the anticipatory bail application of Alpesh Nathabhai Gediya, who was accused of sexual assault and coercion under BNS sections 64(2)(F)(M), 115(2), and 351(2). The court found a prima facie case against the applicant based on allegations that he forcibly engaged in sexual relations with the victim by threatening to share intimate photos, and subsequently threatened her. The court held that the investigation was at a crucial initial stage and custodial interrogation could not be ruled out, therefore no exceptional circumstances justified granting anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case