RAMESH RADHESHYAM JAKHOTIYA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - T A PANCHOLI — 1533/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSR010027712026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1534/2026
Filing Date
28-02-2026
Registration No
1533/2026
Registration Date
28-02-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT
Judge
7-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
60
Police Station
RANDER POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAMESH RADHESHYAM JAKHOTIYA
Adv. A B MIRZA
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - T A PANCHOLI
Hearing History
Judge: 7-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 12-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 09-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 05-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 03-03-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Surat Additional Sessions Court granted interim bail to the accused (Ramesh Radheyshyam Khotiya) under BNS Section 482 in a criminal case involving allegations of cheating, breach of trust, and fraud related to fish farming contracts. The court found that the charge against the accused was not prima facie attractive, the complaint was filed 13 years after the alleged incident with unexplained delay, and a co-accused had already been granted bail on similar grounds, warranting application of the principle of parity. Bail was granted with strict conditions including regular reporting to police, cooperation in investigation, and prohibition against tampering with witnesses or leaving jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Surat Additional Sessions Court granted interim bail to the accused (Ramesh Radheyshyam Khotiya) under BNS Section 482 in a criminal case involving allegations of cheating, breach of trust, and fraud related to fish farming contracts. The court found that the charge against the accused was not prima facie attractive, the complaint was filed 13 years after the alleged incident with unexplained delay, and a co-accused had already been granted bail on similar grounds, warranting application of the principle of parity. Bail was granted with strict conditions including regular reporting to police, cooperation in investigation, and prohibition against tampering with witnesses or leaving jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts